You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
“Cancer Nanotechnology: Methods and Protocols (Methods in Molecular Biology)” by Stephen R. Grobmyer (Editor), Brij M. Moudgil (Editor)
|
---|---|
Published in |
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, September 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-925x-9-55 |
Authors |
Nicole F Steinmetz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 46% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
Researcher | 2 | 15% |
Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 23% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 23% |
Engineering | 2 | 15% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2022.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#136
of 867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,175
of 106,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.