↓ Skip to main content

Mortality among drowning rescuers in China, 2013: a review of 225 rescue incidents from the press

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mortality among drowning rescuers in China, 2013: a review of 225 rescue incidents from the press
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-2010-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yinchao Zhu, Xia Jiang, Hui Li, Fudong Li, Jieping Chen

Abstract

Drowning is common worldwide. Rescue efforts attempted by untrained bystanders often lead to the death of the primary drowning victim (PDV), the rescuer or both. Our study aimed to inform prevention by identifying risk factors in rescuer drowning. Data on drowning rescue incidents reported online in mainland China, 2013, were reviewed. Information on the drowning incidents, PDVs and rescuers were retrieved for analysis. A total of 225 rescue incidents were identified, of which 14 were victim-rescuer drowning incidents (VRDIs) (6.2 %). A person-to-person rescue by swimming to PDVs was the most commonly used method (58.9 %). Resuscitation was given immediately to 35.5 % of PDVs after rescue. The mortality rate of the rescuers (13.3 %) was similar to that of the PDVs (11.5 %) (χ (2) = 0.5, p =0.49). Being an adult (OR = 0.2, 95 % CI: 0.1-0.5) and other than the first rescuer (OR = 0.4, 95 % CI: 0.2-0.9) decreased the risk of rescuers drowning. Most of the currently employed life-saving methods are dangerous and even potentially life threatening. The idea of "rescuers' safety first" should be embraced, especially with teenage and child rescuers, who should never be encouraged to rescue others without first guaranteeing their own safety. Promotion of basic rescue skills should be implemented in the general public.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 23%
Sports and Recreations 5 14%
Social Sciences 5 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2016.
All research outputs
#5,652,339
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,606
of 14,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,020
of 262,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#102
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.