↓ Skip to main content

Prioritizing WHO normative work on maternal and perinatal health: a multicountry survey

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Health, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prioritizing WHO normative work on maternal and perinatal health: a multicountry survey
Published in
Reproductive Health, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1742-4755-8-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cordelia EM Coltart, João Paulo Souza, Ahmet M Gülmezoglu

Abstract

WHO develops evidence-based guidelines for setting global standards and providing technical support to its Member States and the international community, as a whole. There is a clear need to ensure that WHO guidance is relevant, rigorous and up-to date. A key activity is to ascertain the guidance needs of the countries. This study provides an international comparison of priority guidance needs for maternal and perinatal health. It incorporates data from those who inform policy and implementation strategies at a national level, in addition to targeting those who use and most need the guidance at grassroot level.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 24%
Researcher 7 16%
Other 4 9%
Lecturer 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 11 24%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 16%
Social Sciences 6 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 10 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2011.
All research outputs
#6,863,577
of 21,328,399 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#776
of 1,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,653
of 132,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#14
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,328,399 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.