↓ Skip to main content

Simulated unbound structures for benchmarking of protein docking in the Dockground resource

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Simulated unbound structures for benchmarking of protein docking in the Dockground resource
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12859-015-0672-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tatsiana Kirys, Anatoly M. Ruvinsky, Deepak Singla, Alexander V. Tuzikov, Petras J. Kundrotas, Ilya A. Vakser

Abstract

Proteins play an important role in biological processes in living organisms. Many protein functions are based on interaction with other proteins. The structural information is important for adequate description of these interactions. Sets of protein structures determined in both bound and unbound states are essential for benchmarking of the docking procedures. However, the number of such proteins in PDB is relatively small. A radical expansion of such sets is possible if the unbound structures are computationally simulated. The DOCKGROUND public resource provides data to improve our understanding of protein-protein interactions and to assist in the development of better tools for structural modeling of protein complexes, such as docking algorithms and scoring functions. A large set of simulated unbound protein structures was generated from the bound structures. The modeling protocol was based on 1 ns Langevin dynamics simulation. The simulated structures were validated on the ensemble of experimentally determined unbound and bound structures. The set is intended for large scale benchmarking of docking algorithms and scoring functions. A radical expansion of the unbound protein docking benchmark set was achieved by simulating the unbound structures. The simulated unbound structures were selected according to criteria from systematic comparison of experimentally determined bound and unbound structures. The set is publicly available at http://dockground.compbio.ku.edu .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 3%
Japan 1 3%
France 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 27 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 29%
Student > Bachelor 6 19%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 32%
Computer Science 7 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 16%
Chemistry 5 16%
Engineering 2 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2015.
All research outputs
#6,958,429
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,683
of 7,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,845
of 262,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#43
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.