You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-015-0060-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gerta Rücker, Guido Schwarzer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 325 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 57 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 10% |
| Other | 30 | 9% |
| Other | 42 | 13% |
| Unknown | 86 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 30% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 21 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 16 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 52 | 16% |
| Unknown | 112 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,455,082
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,092
of 2,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,741
of 278,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.