↓ Skip to main content

mRNA-based approach to monitor recombinant gamma-interferon restoration of LPS-induced endotoxin tolerance

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
mRNA-based approach to monitor recombinant gamma-interferon restoration of LPS-induced endotoxin tolerance
Published in
Critical Care, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/cc10513
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fanny Turrel-Davin, Fabienne Venet, Cécile Monnin, Véronique Barbalat, Elisabeth Cerrato, Alexandre Pachot, Alain Lepape, Christine Alberti-Segui, Guillaume Monneret

Abstract

It is now well accepted that sepsis is associated with the development of a pronounced immunosuppressive state, characterized by severe immune alterations (e.g. reduced proliferative capacity, endotoxin tolerance, apoptosis) participating in increased mortality and susceptibility to nosocomial infections. Efforts are currently aimed at restoring a functional immune response in septic patients. Successful therapy depends on the identification of appropriate immunostimulatory drugs and on the development of suitable biomarkers that could be used to stratify patients and to follow response to treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Researcher 5 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2022.
All research outputs
#4,835,465
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,282
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,668
of 152,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#16
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.