↓ Skip to main content

Method for improving the quality of genomic DNA obtained from minute quantities of tissue and blood samples using Chelex 100 resin

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Procedures Online, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
254 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Method for improving the quality of genomic DNA obtained from minute quantities of tissue and blood samples using Chelex 100 resin
Published in
Biological Procedures Online, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12575-018-0077-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Utkarsha A. Singh, Mukta Kumari, Soumya Iyengar

Abstract

Although genomic DNA isolation using the Chelex 100 resin is rapid and inexpensive, the DNA obtained by this method has a low concentration in solution and contains suspended impurities. The presence of debris in the DNA solution may result in degradation of DNA on long term storage and inhibition of the polymerase chain reaction. In order to remove impurities and concentrate the DNA in solution, we have introduced modifications in the existing DNA isolation protocol using Chelex-100. We used ammonium acetate to precipitate proteins and a sodium acetate- isopropanol mixture to pellet out DNA which was washed with ethanol. A pure DNA pellet that can be dissolved in water or Tris-EDTA buffer and stored for a long time at - 80 °C was obtained. We also observed a 20-fold change in the DNA concentration following precipitation and re-dissolution. Our method is different from other extraction methods since it uses non-toxic, easily available and inexpensive reagents as well as minimal amounts of blood or tissue samples for the DNA extraction process. Besides its use in sex determination and genotyping in lab animals as described in this paper, it may also have applications in forensic science and diagnostics such as the easy detection of pathogenic DNA in blood.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 254 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 53 21%
Student > Master 30 12%
Researcher 22 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 8%
Unspecified 8 3%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 92 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 4%
Chemistry 9 4%
Unspecified 8 3%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 96 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Biological Procedures Online
#135
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,357
of 342,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Procedures Online
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them