You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Standardizing metadata and taxonomic identification in metabarcoding studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Giga Science, July 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13742-015-0074-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Leho Tedersoo, Kelly S. Ramirez, R Henrik Nilsson, Aivi Kaljuvee, Urmas Kõljalg, Kessy Abarenkov |
Abstract |
High-throughput sequencing-based metabarcoding studies produce vast amounts of ecological data, but a lack of consensus on standardization of metadata and how to refer to the species recovered severely hampers reanalysis and comparisons among studies. Here we propose an automated workflow covering data submission, compression, storage and public access to allow easy data retrieval and inter-study communication. Such standardized and readily accessible datasets facilitate data management, taxonomic comparisons and compilation of global metastudies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 27% |
France | 1 | 9% |
Norway | 1 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
Scientists | 3 | 27% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 110 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 26% |
Researcher | 27 | 23% |
Student > Master | 20 | 17% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 10% |
Unknown | 13 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 51% |
Environmental Science | 10 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
Computer Science | 8 | 7% |
Engineering | 5 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 10% |
Unknown | 15 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2018.
All research outputs
#4,711,222
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Giga Science
#775
of 1,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,417
of 275,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Giga Science
#14
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.