↓ Skip to main content

Development of an animal-borne “sonar tag” for quantifying prey availability: test deployments on northern elephant seals

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Biotelemetry, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of an animal-borne “sonar tag” for quantifying prey availability: test deployments on northern elephant seals
Published in
Animal Biotelemetry, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40317-015-0054-7
Authors

Gareth L. Lawson, Luis A. Hückstädt, Andone C. Lavery, Frédéric M. Jaffré, Peter H. Wiebe, Jonathan R. Fincke, Daniel E. Crocker, Daniel P. Costa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 69 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 22%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 60%
Environmental Science 12 17%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 11 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2015.
All research outputs
#13,396,990
of 23,318,744 outputs
Outputs from Animal Biotelemetry
#178
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,937
of 264,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Biotelemetry
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,318,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.