↓ Skip to main content

Development of an animal-borne “sonar tag” for quantifying prey availability: test deployments on northern elephant seals

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Biotelemetry, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of an animal-borne “sonar tag” for quantifying prey availability: test deployments on northern elephant seals
Published in
Animal Biotelemetry, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40317-015-0054-7
Authors

Gareth L. Lawson, Luis A. Hückstädt, Andone C. Lavery, Frédéric M. Jaffré, Peter H. Wiebe, Jonathan R. Fincke, Daniel E. Crocker, Daniel P. Costa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 65 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 22%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 62%
Environmental Science 11 16%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 9 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2015.
All research outputs
#1,342,266
of 5,436,647 outputs
Outputs from Animal Biotelemetry
#54
of 81 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,627
of 189,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Biotelemetry
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,436,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 81 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.