↓ Skip to main content

Xander: employing a novel method for efficient gene-targeted metagenomic assembly

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
37 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Xander: employing a novel method for efficient gene-targeted metagenomic assembly
Published in
Microbiome, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40168-015-0093-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qiong Wang, Jordan A. Fish, Mariah Gilman, Yanni Sun, C. Titus Brown, James M. Tiedje, James R. Cole

Abstract

Metagenomics can provide important insight into microbial communities. However, assembling metagenomic datasets has proven to be computationally challenging. Current methods often assemble only fragmented partial genes. We present a novel method for targeting assembly of specific protein-coding genes. This method combines a de Bruijn graph, as used in standard assembly approaches, and a protein profile hidden Markov model (HMM) for the gene of interest, as used in standard annotation approaches. These are used to create a novel combined weighted assembly graph. Xander performs both assembly and annotation concomitantly using information incorporated in this graph. We demonstrate the utility of this approach by assembling contigs for one phylogenetic marker gene and for two functional marker genes, first on Human Microbiome Project (HMP)-defined community Illumina data and then on 21 rhizosphere soil metagenomic datasets from three different crops totaling over 800 Gbp of unassembled data. We compared our method to a recently published bulk metagenome assembly method and a recently published gene-targeted assembler and found our method produced more, longer, and higher quality gene sequences. Xander combines gene assignment with the rapid assembly of full-length or near full-length functional genes from metagenomic data without requiring bulk assembly or post-processing to find genes of interest. HMMs used for assembly can be tailored to the targeted genes, allowing flexibility to improve annotation over generic annotation pipelines. This method is implemented as open source software and is available at https://github.com/rdpstaff/Xander_assembler.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 7%
Brazil 3 1%
Estonia 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 179 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 24%
Researcher 51 24%
Student > Master 17 8%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 31 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 91 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 16%
Environmental Science 20 10%
Computer Science 11 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 36 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2016.
All research outputs
#1,343,330
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#457
of 1,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,162
of 269,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.