↓ Skip to main content

A20 deubiquitinase controls PGC-1α expression in the adipose tissue

Overview of attention for article published in Lipids in Health and Disease, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A20 deubiquitinase controls PGC-1α expression in the adipose tissue
Published in
Lipids in Health and Disease, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12944-018-0740-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruna Bombassaro, Leticia M. Ignacio-Souza, Carla E. Nunez, Daniela S. Razolli, Rafael M. Pedro, Andressa Coope, Eliana P. Araujo, Elinton A. Chaim, Licio A. Velloso

Abstract

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator- 1alpha (PGC-1α) plays an important role in whole body metabolism and, particularly in glucose homeostasis. Its expression is highly regulated and, small variations in tissue levels can have a major impact in a number of physiological and pathological conditions. Recent studies have shown that the ubiquitin/proteasome system plays a role in the control of PGC-1α degradation. Here we evaluated the interaction of PGC-1α with the protein A20, which plays a dual-role in the control of the ubiquitin/proteasome system acting as a deubiquitinase and as an E3 ligase. We employed immunoprecipitation, quantitative real-time PCR and immunofluorescence staining to evaluate PGC-1α, A20, PPARγ and ubiquitin in the adipose tissue of humans and mice. In distinct sites of the adipose tissue, A20 binds to PGC-1α. At least in the subcutaneous fat of humans and mice the levels of PGC-1α decrease during obesity, while its physical association with A20 increases. The inhibition of A20 leads to a reduction of PGC-1α and PPARγ expression, suggesting that A20 acts as a protective factor against PGC-1α disposal. We provide evidence that mechanisms regulating PGC-1α ubiquitination are potentially involved in the control of the function of this transcriptional co-activator.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Unspecified 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 5 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,536,861
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Lipids in Health and Disease
#805
of 1,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,469
of 327,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lipids in Health and Disease
#26
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.