↓ Skip to main content

Neglect of skin wounds and the risk of becoming a Staphylococcus aureus nasal carrier: a cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neglect of skin wounds and the risk of becoming a Staphylococcus aureus nasal carrier: a cohort study
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-2104-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hagai Levine, Raid Kayouf, Vladislav Rozhavski, Tamar Sela, Inbal Rajuan-Galor, Anat Tzurel Ferber, Shiraz Yona, Olga Gorochovski, Tami Halperin, Michael Hartal

Abstract

Nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus have an increased risk of acquiring skin and soft tissue infections, which could manifest as outbreaks, especially in crowded settings. Current prevention programs are ineffective, antibiotic resistance is rising and risk factors for becoming a carrier are incompletely understood. We aimed to examine whether a behavior, the neglect of skin wounds, is a risk factor for becoming a Staphylococcus aureus carrier during training. We conducted a field-based cohort study among male infantry trainees in three seasons in Israel during 2011-12. Participants underwent anterior nares cultures and answered structured questionnaires on potential risk factors on two occasions: before and 3 weeks after start of training (N = 542). Attitudes and practices toward neglect of skin wounds were defined as perseverance in training at all costs, despite having a wound. Samples were processed within 18 hours for identification of Staphylococcus aureus. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess risk factors for becoming a carrier. Carriage prevalence increased by 43.3 % during training, from 33.2 % to 47.6 % (p < 0.01). One-fourth (25.4 %) of those with a negative culture before training became carriers. None of the socio-demographic characteristics was a risk factor for becoming a carrier while the risk was lower in the winter (Odds ratio [OR] = 0.42; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.78, p < 0.01) and spring (OR = 0.46; 0.26-0.81, p < 0.01) seasons compared to the summer season. Neglect of skin wounds in practice and attitude was a risk factor for becoming a carrier (OR = 2.40; 1.13-5.12, p = 0.02), as well as neglect in practice or attitude (OR = 1.86; 1.04-3.34, p = 0.04) compared to no neglect when controlled for season. The preventable fraction in the population attributed to neglect of skin wounds was 33 %. Neglect of skin wounds is an independent, common and strong risk factor for becoming a Staphylococcus aureus carrier during training. This preventable behavior should not be ignored and should be addressed in public health programs during training and in other settings. Further research on behavioral determinants of Staphylococcus aureus carriage and infection is warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Other 6 13%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 35%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 16 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2015.
All research outputs
#20,286,650
of 22,821,814 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#13,893
of 14,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,909
of 264,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#293
of 303 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,821,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 303 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.