Title |
Bipartite structure of the inactive mouse X chromosome
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Biology, August 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13059-015-0728-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xinxian Deng, Wenxiu Ma, Vijay Ramani, Andrew Hill, Fan Yang, Ferhat Ay, Joel B. Berletch, Carl Anthony Blau, Jay Shendure, Zhijun Duan, William S. Noble, Christine M. Disteche |
Abstract |
In mammals, one of the female X chromosomes and all imprinted genes are expressed exclusively from a single allele in somatic cells. To evaluate structural changes associated with allelic silencing, we have applied a recently developed Hi-C assay that uses DNase I for chromatin fragmentation to mouse F1 hybrid systems. We find radically different conformations for the two female mouse X chromosomes. The inactive X has two superdomains of frequent intrachromosomal contacts separated by a hinge region. Comparison with the recently reported bipartite 3D structure of the human inactive X shows that the genomic content of the superdomains differs between species, but part of the hinge is conserved and located near the Dxz4/DXZ4 locus. In mouse, the hinge region also contains a minisatellite Ds-TR, and both Dxz4 and Ds-TR appear to be anchored to the nucleolus. Genes that escape X inactivation do not cluster but are located near the periphery of the 3D structure, as are regions enriched in CTCF or RNA polymerase. Fewer short-range intrachromosomal contacts are detected for the inactive alleles of genes subject to X inactivation, compared to the active alleles and to genes that escape X inactivation. This pattern is also evident for imprinted genes, in which more chromatin contacts are detected for the expressed allele. By applying a novel Hi-C method to map allelic chromatin contacts, we discover a specific bipartite organization of the mouse inactive X chromosome that probably plays an important role in maintenance of gene silencing. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | 42% |
France | 2 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
India | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 8 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 15 | 63% |
Members of the public | 8 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Lithuania | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Russia | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 212 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 28% |
Researcher | 40 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 26 | 12% |
Student > Master | 16 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
Other | 31 | 14% |
Unknown | 30 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 98 | 45% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 59 | 27% |
Computer Science | 10 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 2% |
Other | 10 | 5% |
Unknown | 31 | 14% |