↓ Skip to main content

Bipartite structure of the inactive mouse X chromosome

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
24 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
215 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bipartite structure of the inactive mouse X chromosome
Published in
Genome Biology, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13059-015-0728-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xinxian Deng, Wenxiu Ma, Vijay Ramani, Andrew Hill, Fan Yang, Ferhat Ay, Joel B. Berletch, Carl Anthony Blau, Jay Shendure, Zhijun Duan, William S. Noble, Christine M. Disteche

Abstract

In mammals, one of the female X chromosomes and all imprinted genes are expressed exclusively from a single allele in somatic cells. To evaluate structural changes associated with allelic silencing, we have applied a recently developed Hi-C assay that uses DNase I for chromatin fragmentation to mouse F1 hybrid systems. We find radically different conformations for the two female mouse X chromosomes. The inactive X has two superdomains of frequent intrachromosomal contacts separated by a hinge region. Comparison with the recently reported bipartite 3D structure of the human inactive X shows that the genomic content of the superdomains differs between species, but part of the hinge is conserved and located near the Dxz4/DXZ4 locus. In mouse, the hinge region also contains a minisatellite Ds-TR, and both Dxz4 and Ds-TR appear to be anchored to the nucleolus. Genes that escape X inactivation do not cluster but are located near the periphery of the 3D structure, as are regions enriched in CTCF or RNA polymerase. Fewer short-range intrachromosomal contacts are detected for the inactive alleles of genes subject to X inactivation, compared to the active alleles and to genes that escape X inactivation. This pattern is also evident for imprinted genes, in which more chromatin contacts are detected for the expressed allele. By applying a novel Hi-C method to map allelic chromatin contacts, we discover a specific bipartite organization of the mouse inactive X chromosome that probably plays an important role in maintenance of gene silencing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 212 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 28%
Researcher 40 18%
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Student > Master 16 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 30 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 98 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 27%
Computer Science 10 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 31 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,389,325
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,097
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,604
of 275,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#27
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.