You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Discrepancies between survey and administrative data on the use of mental health services in the general population: findings from a study conducted in Québec
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-837 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Aline Drapeau, Richard Boyer, Fatoumata Binta Diallo |
Abstract |
Population surveys and health services registers are the main source of data for the management of public health. Yet, the validity of survey data on the use of mental health services has been questioned repeatedly due to the sensitive nature of mental illness and to the risk of recall bias. The main objectives of this study were to compare data on the use of mental health services from a large scale population survey and a national health services register and to identify the factors associated with the discrepancies observed between these two sources of data. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 73 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 21% |
Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 15 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 25% |
Psychology | 12 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 12% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 21 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2011.
All research outputs
#12,849,499
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,891
of 14,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,974
of 141,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#121
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.