↓ Skip to main content

Experiences of being screened for intimate partner violence during pregnancy: a qualitative study of women in Japan

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Women's Health, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experiences of being screened for intimate partner violence during pregnancy: a qualitative study of women in Japan
Published in
BMC Women's Health, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12905-018-0566-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yaeko Kataoka, Mikiko Imazeki

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is physical, sexual or psychological violence by a current or former intimate partner. IPV threatens women's health, and during pregnancy women are more vulnerable to violence. Therefore, IPV screening has been recommended during antenatal care; however, health care providers have expressed concern about the negative impact on women and therefore have been reluctant in conducting IPV screening. Consequently our objective was to investigate pregnant women's experiences of reading and completing an IPV screening questionnaire. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with postpartum women who had received IPV screening during pregnancy to investigate their experiences using the IVP Violence Against Women Screen (VAWS). Qualitative data were analyzed based on content analysis. A total of 43 women participated in this study. There were eight (18.6%) women positive for IPV screening during pregnancy. Content analysis for all participants revealed three themes: necessity, acceptability and optimality. 'Necessity' referred to benefits for women from IPV screening, and was supported by three categories: 'redefining the relationship', 'promoting IPV awareness' and 'opportunity to initiate support'. 'Acceptability' of IPV screening was also supported by three categories: 'comfortable', 'quickly completed' and 'difficulty'. 'Optimality' meant IPV screening during pregnancy was appropriate timing for women who had been screened as either positive or negative. The majority of women, including women experiencing IPV, had positive responses to IPV screening during pregnancy. Future diffusion of IPV screening requires safe environments for IPV screening and improved awareness of health care providers towards IPV.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 45 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 24 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 14%
Psychology 7 6%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 49 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2018.
All research outputs
#20,522,137
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from BMC Women's Health
#1,692
of 1,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,611
of 331,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Women's Health
#47
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.