You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of self-management support interventions for people with comorbid diabetes and chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-018-0748-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edward Zimbudzi, Clement Lo, Marie L. Misso, Sanjeeva Ranasinha, Peter G. Kerr, Helena J. Teede, Sophia Zoungas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 178 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 12 | 7% |
| Researcher | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 21% |
| Unknown | 61 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 20% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 68 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,890,661
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#505
of 2,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,450
of 345,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#12
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.