↓ Skip to main content

Course and prognosis of recovery for chronic non-specific low back pain: design, therapy program and baseline data of a prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Course and prognosis of recovery for chronic non-specific low back pain: design, therapy program and baseline data of a prospective cohort study
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-12-252
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karin Verkerk, Pim AJ Luijsterburg, Inge Ronchetti, Harald S Miedema, Annelies Pool-Goudzwaard, Jan-Paul van Wingerden, Bart W Koes

Abstract

There has been increasing focus on factors predicting the development of chronic musculoskeletal disorders. For patients already experiencing chronic non-specific low back pain it is also relevant to investigate which prognostic factors predict recovery. We present the design of a cohort study that aims to determine the course and prognostic factors for recovery in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 187 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 21%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Other 17 9%
Researcher 14 7%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 45 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 20%
Psychology 9 5%
Sports and Recreations 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 53 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2011.
All research outputs
#13,357,126
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,897
of 4,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,398
of 141,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#39
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.