↓ Skip to main content

Improving inpatient postnatal services: midwives views and perspectives of engagement in a quality improvement initiative

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving inpatient postnatal services: midwives views and perspectives of engagement in a quality improvement initiative
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-11-293
Pubmed ID
Authors

Debra E Bick, Val Rose, Annette Weavers, Julie Wray, Sarah Beake

Abstract

Despite major policy initiatives in the United Kingdom to enhance women's experiences of maternity care, improving in-patient postnatal care remains a low priority, although it is an aspect of care consistently rated as poor by women. As part of a systems and process approach to improving care at one maternity unit in the South of England, the views and perspectives of midwives responsible for implementing change were sought.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
Malaysia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 93 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 25%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Other 9 9%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 25%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 18 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2011.
All research outputs
#15,238,442
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,519
of 7,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,406
of 141,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#68
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.