↓ Skip to main content

Increased in-hospital mortality following severe head injury in young children: results from a nationwide trauma registry

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Medical Research, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increased in-hospital mortality following severe head injury in young children: results from a nationwide trauma registry
Published in
European Journal of Medical Research, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40001-015-0159-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philipp Lichte, Hagen Andruszkow, Miriam Kappe, Klemens Horst, Miguel Pishnamaz, Frank Hildebrand, Rolf Lefering, Hans-Christoph Pape, Philipp Kobbe, TraumaRegister DGU

Abstract

In the current literature, the outcome of paediatric brain injury is controversially discussed. According to the majority of the studies, there seems to be a decreased mortality but worse recovery in paediatric, traumatic brain injury in comparison with adults. However, there is a lack of information concerning the differences in various stages of development in patients younger than 18 years. The aim of our study was to verify the in-hospital outcome of different paediatric age groups in comparison to adults with respect to the treatment strategy. We performed a retrospective analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU(®) from 2002 to 2012. Inclusion criteria were an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) head ≥3 points and an AIS ≤2 points of the remaining body regions. The collective was divided into different subgroups according to age (1-3, 4-6, 7-10, 11-14, 15-17) and an adult control group aged between 18 and 55 years. We descriptively analysed the endpoint rate of sepsis, multiple organ failure, and mortality. Additionally, the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at discharge was observed. Overall, 1110 children and 6491 adult control patients were included. Comparing the rate of intubation on-scene, the rate of cranial CT scans, the rate of craniotomies, and the rate and length of intensive care treatment, we could only identify minor differences between the age groups. The treatment after discharge from hospital was markedly different due to a very low rate of in-patient rehabilitation treatment in children. On one hand, the rate of systemic complications, such as sepsis and multiple organ failure increased with increasing age. On the other hand, we found a significantly increased mortality in children younger than 7 years after very (AIS head = 5) severe brain injury. The in-hospital functional outcome in survivors, according to the GOS, was beneficial for younger children in comparison to adolescents and adults. We were unable to identify marked age-related differences in the therapeutic approach. Nevertheless, we were able to demonstrate marked differences of outcome. Children younger than 7 years significantly die more often due to direct impact of severe trauma. But if they survive, they seem to develop less systemic complications and profit from a better functional outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 17%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Psychology 3 6%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 15 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2015.
All research outputs
#22,760,732
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Medical Research
#728
of 923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,054
of 276,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Medical Research
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.