↓ Skip to main content

diffHic: a Bioconductor package to detect differential genomic interactions in Hi-C data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
188 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
diffHic: a Bioconductor package to detect differential genomic interactions in Hi-C data
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12859-015-0683-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aaron T.L. Lun, Gordon K. Smyth

Abstract

Chromatin conformation capture with high-throughput sequencing (Hi-C) is a technique that measures the in vivo intensity of interactions between all pairs of loci in the genome. Most conventional analyses of Hi-C data focus on the detection of statistically significant interactions. However, an alternative strategy involves identifying significant changes in the interaction intensity (i.e., differential interactions) between two or more biological conditions. This is more statistically rigorous and may provide more biologically relevant results. Here, we present the diffHic software package for the detection of differential interactions from Hi-C data. diffHic provides methods for read pair alignment and processing, counting into bin pairs, filtering out low-abundance events and normalization of trended or CNV-driven biases. It uses the statistical framework of the edgeR package to model biological variability and to test for significant differences between conditions. Several options for the visualization of results are also included. The use of diffHic is demonstrated with real Hi-C data sets. Performance against existing methods is also evaluated with simulated data. On real data, diffHic is able to successfully detect interactions with significant differences in intensity between biological conditions. It also compares favourably to existing software tools on simulated data sets. These results suggest that diffHic is a viable approach for differential analyses of Hi-C data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 199 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 32%
Researcher 38 18%
Student > Master 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 31 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 76 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 28%
Computer Science 13 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Mathematics 4 2%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 37 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,955,437
of 25,040,629 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#884
of 7,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,942
of 271,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#19
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,040,629 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.