↓ Skip to main content

A convex formulation for joint RNA isoform detection and quantification from multiple RNA-seq samples

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A convex formulation for joint RNA isoform detection and quantification from multiple RNA-seq samples
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12859-015-0695-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elsa Bernard, Laurent Jacob, Julien Mairal, Eric Viara, Jean-Philippe Vert

Abstract

Detecting and quantifying isoforms from RNA-seq data is an important but challenging task. The problem is often ill-posed, particularly at low coverage. One promising direction is to exploit several samples simultaneously. We propose a new method for solving the isoform deconvolution problem jointly across several samples. We formulate a convex optimization problem that allows to share information between samples and that we solve efficiently. We demonstrate the benefits of combining several samples on simulated and real data, and show that our approach outperforms pooling strategies and methods based on integer programming. Our convex formulation to jointly detect and quantify isoforms from RNA-seq data of multiple related samples is a computationally efficient approach to leverage the hypotheses that some isoforms are likely to be present in several samples. The software and source code are available at http://cbio.ensmp.fr/flipflop .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Israel 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Unknown 40 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 36%
Researcher 11 25%
Student > Master 5 11%
Other 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 20%
Computer Science 7 16%
Engineering 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 2 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2016.
All research outputs
#2,809,326
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#946
of 7,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,311
of 266,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#19
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.