↓ Skip to main content

The strengths and difficulties questionnaire as a screening instrument for norwegian child and adolescent mental health services, application of UK scoring algorithms

Overview of attention for article published in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The strengths and difficulties questionnaire as a screening instrument for norwegian child and adolescent mental health services, application of UK scoring algorithms
Published in
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1753-2000-5-32
Pubmed ID
Authors

Per Håkan Brøndbo, Børge Mathiassen, Monica Martinussen, Einar Heiervang, Mads Eriksen, Therese Fjeldmo Moe, Guri Sæther, Siv Kvernmo

Abstract

The use of screening instruments can reduce waiting lists and increase treatment capacity. The aim of this study was to examine the usefulness of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) with the original UK scoring algorithms, when used as a screening instrument to detect mental health disorders among patients in the Norwegian Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) North Study.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 90 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 18%
Researcher 16 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 23%
Social Sciences 9 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 19 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2011.
All research outputs
#7,807,930
of 12,445,334 outputs
Outputs from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
#308
of 422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,726
of 106,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
#12
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,445,334 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.