↓ Skip to main content

Differences in proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes: assessing health and functional status among medicare beneficiaries

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences in proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes: assessing health and functional status among medicare beneficiaries
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12874-015-0053-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Minghui Li, Ilene Harris, Z. Kevin Lu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 21%
Student > Master 8 17%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 28%
Psychology 8 17%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 10 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,379,032
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,106
of 2,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,612
of 276,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.