You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Criteria for evaluating transferability of health interventions: a systematic review and thematic synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-018-0751-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tamara Schloemer, Peter Schröder-Bäck |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 9 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 13% |
| United States | 6 | 11% |
| Australia | 6 | 11% |
| Ireland | 4 | 7% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 52% |
| Scientists | 23 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 249 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 16% |
| Researcher | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 14% |
| Unknown | 75 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 9% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 38 | 15% |
| Unknown | 87 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2022.
All research outputs
#876,221
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#96
of 1,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,655
of 343,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#5
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.