↓ Skip to main content

Socio-cultural features and help-seeking preferences for leprosy and tuberculosis: a cultural epidemiological study in a tribal district of Maharashtra, India

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious Diseases of Poverty, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Socio-cultural features and help-seeking preferences for leprosy and tuberculosis: a cultural epidemiological study in a tribal district of Maharashtra, India
Published in
Infectious Diseases of Poverty, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40249-015-0064-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amar Prakash Maske, Pravin Arun Sawant, Saju Joseph, Uma Satish Mahajan, Abhay Machindra Kudale

Abstract

India is a major contributor to the global burden of leprosy and tuberculosis (TB), which adversely affects the poorest tribal communities. Despite prioritisation by disease control programmes, programme performance for leprosy and TB in tribal communities continues to be a challenge. In addition to access to services and infrastructural limitations, socio-cultural concepts of illness causation and related help seeking (HS) rooted in distinct features of tribal culture need to be addressed to improve programme outcomes. A cultural epidemiological survey of leprosy and TB patients was carried out using a locally adapted, semi-structured explanatory model interviews. A total of 100 leprosy and 50 TB patients registered for treatment at government health facilities were selected randomly from tribal dominant blocks of the Thane district, Maharashtra state. The perceived causes (PCs) of leprosy and TB in patients were compared based on prominence categories. The relationship between PCs as predictors, and disease conditions and HS preferences as outcome variables were assessed using multivariate logistic regression. In the multivariate logistic regression model with disease conditions as outcome variables, TB patients were significantly more likely to report PCs in the categories of ingestion; health, illness and injury; and traditional, cultural and supernatural. Tuberculosis patients more frequently first sought help from private facilities as compared to leprosy patients who preferred government health facilities. In a combined analysis of leprosy and TB patients employing multivariate logistic regression, it was found that patients who reported PCs in the environmental and contact-related categories were more likely to visit traditional rather than non-traditional practitioners. In another multivariate combined model, it was found that patients who reported PCs in the traditional, cultural and supernatural category were significantly more likely to visit private rather than public health facilities. Cultural concepts about illness causation and associated HS behaviours should be considered as priorities for action, which in turn would provide the necessary impetus to ensure that tribal patients seek help in a timely and appropriate manner, and could facilitate improvement in programme performance in general.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 3 3%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 106 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 17%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 32 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 16%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 39 35%