You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Protocol: methodology for chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4811-7-35 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniela Strenkert, Stefan Schmollinger, Michael Schroda |
| Abstract |
We report on a detailed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) protocol for the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. The protocol is suitable for the analysis of nucleosome occupancy, histone modifications and transcription factor binding sites at the level of mononucleosomes for targeted and genome-wide studies. We describe the optimization of conditions for crosslinking, chromatin fragmentation and antibody titer determination and provide recommendations and an example for the normalization of ChIP results as determined by real-time PCR. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 30% |
| Researcher | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 55% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 25% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2011.
All research outputs
#15,238,442
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#819
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,471
of 141,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.