↓ Skip to main content

Planned development and evaluation protocol of two versions of a web-based computer-tailored nutrition education intervention aimed at adults, including cognitive and environmental feedback

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Planned development and evaluation protocol of two versions of a web-based computer-tailored nutrition education intervention aimed at adults, including cognitive and environmental feedback
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda Springvloet, Lilian Lechner, Anke Oenema

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 175 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 16%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 44 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 22 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 12%
Psychology 21 12%
Social Sciences 16 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Other 37 21%
Unknown 51 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2015.
All research outputs
#18,423,683
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,855
of 14,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,132
of 304,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#265
of 296 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 296 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.