↓ Skip to main content

Anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive drugs and reproduction

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
482 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
294 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive drugs and reproduction
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, May 2006
DOI 10.1186/ar1957
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monika Østensen, Munther Khamashta, Michael Lockshin, Ann Parke, Antonio Brucato, Howard Carp, Andrea Doria, Raj Rai, Pierluigi Meroni, Irene Cetin, Ronald Derksen, Ware Branch, Mario Motta, Caroline Gordon, Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza, Arsenio Spinillo, Deborah Friedman, Rolando Cimaz, Andrew Czeizel, Jean Charles Piette, Ricard Cervera, Roger A Levy, Maurizio Clementi, Sara De Carolis, Michelle Petri, Yehuda Shoenfeld, David Faden, Guido Valesini, Angela Tincani

Abstract

Rheumatic diseases in women of childbearing years may necessitate drug treatment during a pregnancy, to control maternal disease activity and to ensure a successful pregnancy outcome. This survey is based on a consensus workshop of international experts discussing effects of anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressive and biological drugs during pregnancy and lactation. In addition, effects of these drugs on male and female fertility and possible long-term effects on infants exposed to drugs antenatally are discussed where data were available. Recommendations for drug treatment during pregnancy and lactation are given.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 278 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 13%
Student > Master 37 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 11%
Other 30 10%
Student > Bachelor 25 9%
Other 78 27%
Unknown 56 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 156 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 3%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 62 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,138,595
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#643
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,250
of 83,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.