↓ Skip to main content

Primary cardiac tumors on the verge of oblivion: a European experience over 15 years

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 1,231)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Primary cardiac tumors on the verge of oblivion: a European experience over 15 years
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13019-015-0255-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Habertheuer, Günther Laufer, Dominik Wiedemann, Martin Andreas, Marek Ehrlich, Claus Rath, Alfred Kocher

Abstract

Primary tumors of the heart represent an exceedingly rare entity in cardiac surgery and literature regarding management and outcome is rare. The aim of this study was to translate 15 years of experience in both multimodal diagnosis and surgical treatment of one of the largest collective of patients in literature into a detailed analysis of patient prognosis, mean survival and best treatment approach. All patients who underwent open-heart surgery at the Hospital of the Medical University of Vienna for primary cardiac tumor excision between 1999 and 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. Mean follow-up was 76.8 months. Descriptive statistical measurements were applied. 113 patients were identified, 71 (62.8%) female and 42 (37.2%) male patients with a mean age of 57.9 ± 16.8 years. 90.3% (n = 102) masses were benign, 9.7% (n = 11) were malignant. Complete resection was possible for 99% and for 18.2% of benign and malignant masses, respectively. 2.9% of benign tumors and 45.5% of malignant tumors relapsed. The 30-day mortality was 1.8% (n = 2). Mean survival was 187.2 ± 2.7 months and 26.2 ± 9.8 months for benign and malignant pathologies, respectively. Sarcoma patients who underwent adjuvant combination-chemotherapy or adjuvant mono-chemotherapy and radiation had a statistically significant survival advantage of 41,5 months. Primary cardiac tumors remain challenging in the clinical setting. A multimodality treatment approach especially for sarcoma patients prolongs mean survival and should be regarded as the standard of care.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Master 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 14 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 57%
Psychology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2022.
All research outputs
#3,741,757
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#45
of 1,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,498
of 265,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them