↓ Skip to main content

Differential expression of cytokines and receptor expression during anoxic growth

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differential expression of cytokines and receptor expression during anoxic growth
Published in
BMC Research Notes, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13104-018-3520-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Balbina J. Plotkin, Ira M. Sigar, Julie A. Swartzendruber, Amber Kaminski, James Davis

Abstract

Cell density in tumor cell three dimensional (3D) cultures affects secretome expression of components. A microenvironment characteristic shared by high-density 3D cell culture and in vivo tumor masses is poor oxygenation, with anoxia being a natural cell state in tumor centers. Until recently, the ability to study anoxia-adapted cell physiology was not possible. Using a newly-developed methodology, anoxic HeLa cell secretome expression was measured. Anoxic HeLa cell cytokine levels after 3 days' (hypoxia inducible factor, HIF1 positive) and 10 days' growth (HIF1 negative; anaerobic respiration) were significantly (p < 0.01) higher than normoxic controls for: IL-8 (1.8- and 3.4-fold higher, respectively), GRO (1.3- and 1.1-fold higher, respectively), and IL-11 (1.4- and 1.1-fold higher, respectively). In contrast, G-CSF, IFNα2, and CXCL-10 levels decreased over time (day 3 vs. day 10). Thus, metabolically active HeLa cells respond to the lack of oxygen, in part, by regulating the levels of cytokines produced. Cytokines expressed at increased levels, in the absence of oxygen, correspond to a secretomic profile reported for paracrine signaling pathways associated with metastasis. Further studies defining physiologic changes that occur upon anoxic growth may lead to the discovery of novel chemotherapeutic drug targets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 63%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2018.
All research outputs
#18,640,437
of 23,092,602 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,039
of 4,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,161
of 328,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#91
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,092,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.