You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The top five research priorities in physician-provided pre-hospital critical care: a consensus report from a European research collaboration
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1757-7241-19-57 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Espen Fevang, David Lockey, Julian Thompson, Hans Morten Lossius, The Torpo Research Collaboration |
Abstract |
Physician-manned emergency medical teams supplement other emergency medical services in some countries. These teams are often selectively deployed to patients who are considered likely to require critical care treatment in the pre-hospital phase. The evidence base for guidelines for pre-hospital triage and immediate medical care is often poor. We used a recognised consensus methodology to define key priority areas for research within the subfield of physician-provided pre-hospital critical care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
Australia | 1 | 11% |
United States | 1 | 11% |
Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
Spain | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Austria | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 152 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 25 | 16% |
Researcher | 22 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
Other | 13 | 8% |
Other | 41 | 26% |
Unknown | 24 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 90 | 57% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
Other | 13 | 8% |
Unknown | 29 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2023.
All research outputs
#4,101,910
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#405
of 1,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,547
of 148,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.