↓ Skip to main content

DRD2 and DRD4 genes related to cognitive deficits in HIV-infected adults who abuse alcohol

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral and Brain Functions, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DRD2 and DRD4 genes related to cognitive deficits in HIV-infected adults who abuse alcohol
Published in
Behavioral and Brain Functions, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12993-015-0072-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karina Villalba, Jessy G. Devieux, Rhonda Rosenberg, Jean Lud Cadet

Abstract

HIV-infected individuals continue to experience neurocognitive deterioration despite virologically successful treatments. The causes of neurocognitive impairment are still unclear. However, several factors have been suggested including the role of genetics. There is evidence suggesting that neurocognitive impairment is heritable and individual differences in cognition are strongly driven by genetic variations. The contribution of genetic variants affecting the metabolism and activity of dopamine may influence these individual differences. The present study explored the relationship between two candidate genes (DRD4 and DRD2) and neurocognitive performance in HIV-infected adults. A total of 267 HIV-infected adults were genotyped for polymorphisms, DRD4 48 bp-variable number tandem repeat (VNTR), DRD2 rs6277 and ANKK1 rs1800497. The Short Category (SCT), Color Trail (CTT) and Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Tests (ROCT) were used to measure executive function and memory. Results showed significant associations with the SNP rs6277 and impaired executive function (odds ratio = 3.3, 95 % CI 1.2-2.6; p = 0.004) and cognitive flexibility (odds ratio = 1.6, 95 % CI 2.0-5.7; p = 0.001). The results were further stratified by race and sex and significant results were seen in males (odds ratio = 3.5, 95 % CI 1.5-5.5; p = 0.008) and in African Americans (odds ratio = 3.1, 95 % CI 2.3-3.5; p = 0.01). Also, DRD4 VNTR 7-allele was significantly associated with executive dysfunction. The study shows that genetically determined differences in the SNP rs6277 DRD2 gene and DRD4 48 bp VNTR may be risk factors for deficits in executive function and cognitive flexibility.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 82 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 25 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Neuroscience 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 29 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2016.
All research outputs
#15,345,593
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#246
of 391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,131
of 267,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.