↓ Skip to main content

Development of a 3D immersive videogame to improve arm-postural coordination in patients with TBI

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of a 3D immersive videogame to improve arm-postural coordination in patients with TBI
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-8-61
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ksenia I Ustinova, Wesley A Leonard, Nicholas D Cassavaugh, Christopher D Ingersoll

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) disrupts the central and executive mechanisms of arm(s) and postural (trunk and legs) coordination. To address these issues, we developed a 3D immersive videogame--Octopus. The game was developed using the basic principles of videogame design and previous experience of using videogames for rehabilitation of patients with acquired brain injuries. Unlike many other custom-designed virtual environments, Octopus included an actual gaming component with a system of multiple rewards, making the game challenging, competitive, motivating and fun. Effect of a short-term practice with the Octopus game on arm-postural coordination in patients with TBI was tested.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Canada 3 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 197 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 18%
Student > Master 35 16%
Student > Bachelor 30 14%
Researcher 27 13%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 39 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 20%
Engineering 20 9%
Computer Science 20 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 9%
Psychology 19 9%
Other 52 24%
Unknown 43 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#447
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,391
of 153,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.