You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Study protocol of a Dutch smoking cessation e-health program
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-847 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicola E Stanczyk, Catherine Bolman, Jean WM Muris, Hein de Vries |
| Abstract |
The study aims to test the differential effects of a web-based text and a web-based video-driven computer-tailored approach for lower socio-economic status (LSES) and higher socio-economic status (HSES) smokers which incorporate multiple computer-tailored feedback moments. The two programs differ only in the mode of delivery (video- versus text-based messages). The paper aims to describe the development and design of the two computer-tailored programs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 149 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 18% |
| Researcher | 28 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 38 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 30 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2012.
All research outputs
#6,326,895
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,636
of 14,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,261
of 142,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#80
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.