↓ Skip to main content

An investigation of plasma collection, stabilization, and storage procedures for proteomic analysis of clinical samples

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Proteomics, March 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An investigation of plasma collection, stabilization, and storage procedures for proteomic analysis of clinical samples
Published in
Clinical Proteomics, March 2004
DOI 10.1385/cp:1:1:017
Authors

Jeffrey D. Hulmes, Deidra Bethea, Keith Ho, Shu-Pang Huang, Deborah L. Ricci, Gregory J. Opiteck, Stanley A. Hefta

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 37%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 30%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Engineering 2 7%
Chemistry 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 1 3%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2011.
All research outputs
#7,572,368
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Proteomics
#92
of 285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,151
of 55,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Proteomics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 55,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.