↓ Skip to main content

Six ‘biases’ against patients and carers in evidence-based medicine

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
183 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
442 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Six ‘biases’ against patients and carers in evidence-based medicine
Published in
BMC Medicine, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12916-015-0437-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trisha Greenhalgh, Rosamund Snow, Sara Ryan, Sian Rees, Helen Salisbury

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 567 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 442 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 2%
United States 4 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 425 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 15%
Researcher 65 15%
Student > Master 61 14%
Other 44 10%
Student > Bachelor 42 10%
Other 98 22%
Unknown 66 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 131 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 72 16%
Social Sciences 58 13%
Psychology 24 5%
Arts and Humanities 10 2%
Other 59 13%
Unknown 88 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 392. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2024.
All research outputs
#80,053
of 25,911,277 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#87
of 4,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#846
of 277,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#5
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,911,277 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.