↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of standard exponential and linear techniques to amplify small cDNA samples for microarrays

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, May 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
13 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of standard exponential and linear techniques to amplify small cDNA samples for microarrays
Published in
BMC Genomics, May 2005
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-6-61
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johan Wadenbäck, David H Clapham, Deborah Craig, Ronald Sederoff, Gary F Peter, Sara von Arnold, Ulrika Egertsdotter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 41%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Master 4 14%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 66%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 3 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2023.
All research outputs
#5,163,606
of 24,387,992 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,096
of 10,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,195
of 60,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,387,992 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,969 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.