You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Electronic and paper versions of a faces pain intensity scale: concordance and preference in hospitalized children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2431-11-87 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chantal Wood, Carl L von Baeyer, Sylvain Falinower, Dominique Moyse, Daniel Annequin, Valérie Legout |
| Abstract |
Assessment of pain in children is an important aspect of pain management and can be performed by observational methods or by self-assessment. The Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) is a self-report tool which has strong positive correlations with other well established self-report pain intensity measures. It has been recommended for measuring pain intensity in school-aged children (4 years and older). The objective of this study is to compare the concordance and the preference for two versions, electronic and paper, of the FPS-R, and to determine whether an electronic version of the FPS-R can be used by children aged 4 and older. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Romania | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 18% |
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 20% |
| Unknown | 20 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 24% |
| Psychology | 15 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 25 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2011.
All research outputs
#20,150,151
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#2,570
of 2,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,009
of 135,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#31
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.