↓ Skip to main content

Stigma, HIV and health: a qualitative synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
255 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
565 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stigma, HIV and health: a qualitative synthesis
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-2197-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lori A. Chambers, Sergio Rueda, D. Nico Baker, Michael G. Wilson, Rachel Deutsch, Elmira Raeifar, Sean B. Rourke, The Stigma Review Team

Abstract

HIV-related stigma continues to negatively impact the health and well-being of people living with HIV, with deleterious effects on their care, treatment and quality of life. A growing body of qualitative research has documented the relationship between HIV-related stigma and health. This review aims to synthesize qualitative evidence that explored the intersections of stigma and health for people with HIV. A thematic summary was conducted that was guided by the qualitative metasummary technique developed by Sandelowski and Barraso. Literature searches yielded 8,622 references of which 55 qualitative studies were identified that illustrated HIV-related stigma in the context of health. The metasummary classified qualitative findings into three overarching categories: conceptualizing stigma which identified key dimensions of HIV-related stigma; experiencing stigma which highlighted experiences of stigma in the health context, and managing stigma which described ways in which stigma is avoided or addressed. To better illustrate these connections, the qualitative literature was summarized into the following themes: stigma within health care settings, the role of stigma in caring for one's health, and strategies to address HIV-related stigma in the health context. A number of health care practices were identified - some rooted in institutional practices, others shaped by personal perceptions held by practitioners - that could be stigmatizing or discriminatory towards people with HIV. There existed interconnections between enacted stigma and felt stigma that influenced health care utilization, treatment adherence, and overall health and well-being of people with HIV. Intersectional stigma also emerged as instrumental in the stigma experiences of people living with HIV. A number of strategies to address stigma were identified including social support, education, self-efficacy, resilience activities, and advocacy. This review of the qualitative evidence indicates that HIV-related stigma within health contexts is a broad social phenomenon that manifests within multiple social spheres, including health care environments. Findings from this review indicate that future stigma research should consider the social structures and societal practices - within and outside of health care environments - that perpetuate and reinforce stigma and discrimination towards people with HIV.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 565 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 561 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 109 19%
Student > Bachelor 73 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 10%
Researcher 51 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 6%
Other 86 15%
Unknown 154 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 95 17%
Social Sciences 65 12%
Psychology 50 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 2%
Other 66 12%
Unknown 170 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2017.
All research outputs
#3,100,258
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,560
of 14,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,646
of 266,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#80
of 329 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 329 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.