↓ Skip to main content

Mindfulness, perceived stress, and subjective well-being: a correlational study in primary care health professionals

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
463 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mindfulness, perceived stress, and subjective well-being: a correlational study in primary care health professionals
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12906-015-0823-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana C. M. Atanes, Solange Andreoni, Marcio S. Hirayama, Jesús Montero-Marin, Viviam V. Barros, Telmo M. Ronzani, Eliza H. Kozasa, Joaquim Soler, Ausiàs Cebolla, Javier Garcia-Campayo, Marcelo M. P. Demarzo

Abstract

Primary health care professionals (PHPs) usually report high levels of distress and burnout symptoms related to job strain. Mindfulness, defined as non-judgmental-present-moment awareness, seems to be a moderator in the causal association between life stressors and well-being. This study aimed to verify correlations among self-reported mindfulness, perceived stress (PS), and subjective well-being (SW) in Brazilian PHPs. We performed a correlational cross-sectional study in a purposive sample of Brazilian PHPs (physicians, nurses, nursing assistants, and community health workers), working in community-oriented primary care programs (known locally as "Family Health Programs"). We used validated self-reporting instruments: the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS), the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and the Subjective Well-being Scale (SWS). We performed a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), through regression coefficients (beta) in relation to the professional category (nursing assistant), in addition to the length of time in the same job (under than 6 months) that had indicated the lowest level of PS. Participants (n = 450) comprised community health workers (65.8 %), nursing assistants (18 %), registered nurses (10.0 %), and doctors (family physicians) (6.0 %); 94 % were female and 83.1 % had worked in the same position for more than one year. MANOVA regression analysis showed differences across professional categories and length of time in the same job position in relation to mindfulness, PS, and SW. Nurses demonstrated lower levels of mindfulness, higher PS, and SW negative affect, as well as lower SW positive affect. Being at work for 1 year or longer showed a clear association with higher PS and lower SW positive affect, and no significance with mindfulness levels. Pearson's coefficient values indicated strong negative correlations between mindfulness and PS, and medium correlations between mindfulness and SW. In this study, there were clear correlations between mindfulness, PS, and SW across different primary care professional categories and time in the same job position, suggesting specific vulnerabilities that should be addressed through the development of staff awareness, stress prevention, and well-being interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 463 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 457 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 14%
Student > Bachelor 66 14%
Researcher 40 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 8%
Other 104 22%
Unknown 113 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 103 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 82 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 63 14%
Social Sciences 21 5%
Unspecified 7 2%
Other 53 11%
Unknown 134 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2015.
All research outputs
#7,466,608
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,241
of 3,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,143
of 267,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#29
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.