You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dietary use and conservation concern of edible wetland plants at indo-burma hotspot: a case study from northeast India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4269-7-29 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A Jain, M Sundriyal, S Roshnibala, R Kotoky, PB Kanjilal, HB Singh, RC Sundriyal |
| Abstract |
The wetlands of the North East India fall among the global hotspots of biodiversity. However, they have received very little attention with relation to their intrinsic values to human kind; therefore their conservation is hardly addressed. These wetlands are critical for the sustenance of the tribal communities. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 134 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 19% |
| Unknown | 35 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 26% |
| Environmental Science | 26 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 35 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2013.
All research outputs
#4,881,932
of 23,905,714 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#167
of 752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,071
of 135,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,905,714 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.