↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ and FOXP3+ lymphocytes in residual tumors and alterations in these parameters after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: a…

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
216 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ and FOXP3+ lymphocytes in residual tumors and alterations in these parameters after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: a retrospective multicenter study
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13058-015-0632-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Minoru Miyashita, Hironobu Sasano, Kentaro Tamaki, Hisashi Hirakawa, Yayoi Takahashi, Saki Nakagawa, Gou Watanabe, Hiroshi Tada, Akihiko Suzuki, Noriaki Ohuchi, Takanori Ishida

Abstract

The status of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has been recently proposed to predict clinical outcome of patients with breast cancer. We therefore studied the prognostic significance of CD8(+) TILs and FOXP3(+) TILs in residual tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and the alterations in these parameters before and after NAC in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). One hundred thirty-one TNBC patients who received NAC at three institutions were examined. CD8(+) TIL and FOXP3(+) TIL in residual tumors and biopsy specimens were evaluated by double-staining immunohistochemistry. The CD8(+) TIL and FOXP3(+) TIL status of the residual tumors was assessed, and the rates of their changes before and after NAC were calculated. TNBC patients with high CD8(+) TIL levels or a high CD8/FOXP3 ratio in residual tumors had significantly better recurrence-free survival (RFS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) than patients with low values of these parameters. In multivariate analyses, CD8(+) TIL exhibited strong prognostic significance for RFS, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.09 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.537-6.614, P=0.0013). The CD8/FOXP3 ratio was also significantly correlated with RFS (HR=2.07, 95 % CI 1.029-4.436, P=0.0412). TNBC with larger residual tumor size and positive lymph node status, which are known prognostic factors, was independently associated with worse RFS (P=0.0064 and P=0.0015, respectively). High CD8(+) TIL levels were a markedly powerful indicator of improved BCSS, with an HR of 3.59 (95 % CI 1.499-9.581, P=0.0036). Nodal status was also associated with BCSS (P=0.0024). TNBC with a high rate of CD8(+) TIL changes was associated with significantly better RFS compared with the low group (P=0.011). Higher rates of changes in the CD8/FOXP3 ratio were significantly correlated with both better RFS and BCSS compared with lower rates (P=0.011 and P=0.023, respectively). This is the first study to demonstrate that high CD8(+) TIL and a high CD8/FOXP3 ratio in residual tumors and increment of these parameters following NAC and accurately predict improved prognosis in TNBC patients with non-pathological complete response following NAC. These parameters could serve as a surrogate one for adjuvant treatment in patients with residual disease in the neoadjuvant setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 188 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 19%
Researcher 26 14%
Student > Master 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 43 23%
Unknown 34 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 44 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2015.
All research outputs
#14,913,921
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#1,295
of 2,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,817
of 277,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#24
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.