↓ Skip to main content

Priorities and realities: addressing the rich-poor gaps in health status and service access in Indonesia

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Priorities and realities: addressing the rich-poor gaps in health status and service access in Indonesia
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1475-9276-10-47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Budi Utomo, Purwa K Sucahya, Fita R Utami

Abstract

Over the past four decades, the Indonesian health care system has greatly expanded and the health of Indonesian people has improved although the rich-poor gap in health status and service access remains an issue. The government has been trying to address these gaps and intensify efforts to improve the health of the poor following the economic crisis in 1998.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 5 2%
United States 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 208 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 26%
Researcher 29 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 10%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 47 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 16%
Social Sciences 24 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 15 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 54 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2011.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#2,168
of 2,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,592
of 155,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#17
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.