You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Maximising the impact of qualitative research in feasibility studies for randomised controlled trials: guidance for researchers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-015-0026-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alicia O’Cathain, Pat Hoddinott, Simon Lewin, Kate J. Thomas, Bridget Young, Joy Adamson, Yvonne JFM. Jansen, Nicola Mills, Graham Moore, Jenny L. Donovan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 124 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 57 | 46% |
| Ireland | 6 | 5% |
| Canada | 5 | 4% |
| Spain | 4 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 36 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 66 | 53% |
| Scientists | 36 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 531 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 528 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 95 | 18% |
| Researcher | 87 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 69 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 5% |
| Other | 96 | 18% |
| Unknown | 126 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 80 | 15% |
| Psychology | 77 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 54 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 61 | 11% |
| Unknown | 152 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2021.
All research outputs
#544,782
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#8
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,102
of 280,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them