↓ Skip to main content

Biphasic positive airway pressure minimizes biological impact on lung tissue in mild acute lung injury independent of etiology

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biphasic positive airway pressure minimizes biological impact on lung tissue in mild acute lung injury independent of etiology
Published in
Critical Care, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/cc13051
Pubmed ID
Authors

Felipe Saddy, Lillian Moraes, Cintia Lourenço Santos, Gisele Pena Oliveira, Fernanda Ferreira Cruz, Marcelo Marcos Morales, Vera Luiza Capelozzi, Marcelo Gama de Abreu, Cristiane Souza Nascimento Baez Garcia, Paolo Pelosi, Patricia Rieken Macêdo Rocco

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 7%
Unknown 40 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Professor 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 51%
Engineering 4 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Psychology 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 11 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2020.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,211
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,079
of 222,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#68
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.