↓ Skip to main content

Comparing two intramedullary devices for treating trochanteric fractures: A prospective study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 639)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing two intramedullary devices for treating trochanteric fractures: A prospective study
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, February 2010
DOI 10.1186/1749-799x-5-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Konstantinos G Makridis, Vasileios Georgaklis, Miltiadis Georgoussis, Vasileios Mandalos, Vasileios Kontogeorgakos, Leonidas Badras

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 16%
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 60%
Engineering 3 12%
Psychology 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Unknown 5 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2015.
All research outputs
#1,924,569
of 12,440,051 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#36
of 639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,954
of 240,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,440,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 639 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.