You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparing two intramedullary devices for treating trochanteric fractures: A prospective study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1749-799x-5-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Konstantinos G Makridis, Vasileios Georgaklis, Miltiadis Georgoussis, Vasileios Mandalos, Vasileios Kontogeorgakos, Leonidas Badras |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 15% |
| Researcher | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 58% |
| Engineering | 3 | 12% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2015.
All research outputs
#4,179,510
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#122
of 1,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,841
of 94,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,371 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them