↓ Skip to main content

Why California retailers stop selling tobacco products, and what their customers and employees think about it when they do: case studies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why California retailers stop selling tobacco products, and what their customers and employees think about it when they do: case studies
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-848
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia A McDaniel, Ruth E Malone

Abstract

In California, some 40,000 retailers sell tobacco products. Tobacco's ubiquitousness in retail settings normalizes use and cues smoking urges among former smokers and those attempting cessation. Thus, limiting the number of retailers is regarded as key to ending the tobacco epidemic. In the past decade, independent pharmacies and local grocery chains in California and elsewhere have voluntarily abandoned tobacco sales. No previous studies have examined the reasons for this emerging phenomenon. We sought to learn what motivated retailers to discontinue tobacco sales and what employees and customers thought about their decision.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Unknown 60 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 19%
Researcher 11 17%
Other 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 15 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Psychology 5 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 20 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,845,687
of 25,109,453 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,082
of 16,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,904
of 148,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#16
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,109,453 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.