The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, the correct scientific name for the fungus causing ash dieback in Europe
|
---|---|
Published in |
IMA Fungus, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.5598/imafungus.2014.05.01.09 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hans-Otto Baral, Valentin Queloz, Tsuyoshi Hosoya |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 113 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 29 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 18% |
Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Unknown | 23 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 55 | 47% |
Environmental Science | 25 | 21% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | <1% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 28 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,634,027
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from IMA Fungus
#13
of 253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,855
of 240,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IMA Fungus
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them