↓ Skip to main content

An introduction to immunology and immunopathology

Overview of attention for article published in Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
864 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An introduction to immunology and immunopathology
Published in
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1710-1492-7-s1-s1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Warrington, Wade Watson, Harold L Kim, Francesca Romana Antonetti

Abstract

In basic terms, the immune system has two lines of defense: innate immunity and adaptive immunity. Innate immunity is the first immunological, non-specific (antigen-independent) mechanism for fighting against an intruding pathogen. It is a rapid immune response, occurring within minutes or hours after aggression, that has no immunologic memory. Adaptive immunity, on the other hand, is antigen-dependent and antigen-specific; it has the capacity for memory, which enables the host to mount a more rapid and efficient immune response upon subsequent exposure to the antigen. There is a great deal of synergy between the adaptive immune system and its innate counterpart, and defects in either system can provoke illness or disease, such as autoimmune diseases, immunodeficiency disorders and hypersensitivity reactions. This article provides a practical overview of innate and adaptive immunity, and describes how these host defense mechanisms are involved in both health and illness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 864 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 852 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 179 21%
Student > Master 142 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 131 15%
Researcher 67 8%
Other 39 5%
Other 102 12%
Unknown 204 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 144 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 141 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 119 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 85 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 37 4%
Other 113 13%
Unknown 225 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,295,640
of 25,654,566 outputs
Outputs from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#66
of 927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,742
of 155,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.