↓ Skip to main content

Oral vaccination of dogs: a well-studied and undervalued tool for achieving human and dog rabies elimination

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Research, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 1,337)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oral vaccination of dogs: a well-studied and undervalued tool for achieving human and dog rabies elimination
Published in
Veterinary Research, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13567-018-0554-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Florence Cliquet, Anne-Laure Guiot, Michel Aubert, Emmanuelle Robardet, Charles E. Rupprecht, François-Xavier Meslin

Abstract

The mass vaccination of dogs is a proven tool for rabies prevention. Besides parenteral delivery of inactivated vaccines, over the past several decades, several self-replicating biologics, including modified-live, attenuated and recombinant viruses, have been evaluated for the oral vaccination of dogs against rabies. Vaccines are included within an attractive bait for oral consumption by free-ranging dogs. Due to the high affinity between dogs and humans, such biologics intended for oral vaccination of dogs (OVD) need to be efficacious as well as safe. Baits should be preferentially attractive to dogs and not to non-target species. Although many different types have been evaluated successfully, no universal bait has been identified to date. Moreover, high bait acceptance does not necessarily mean that vaccine efficacy and programmatic success is predictable. The use of OVD in the laboratory and field has demonstrated the safety and utility of this technology. Within a One Health context, OVD should be considered as part of a holistic plan for the global elimination of canine rabies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Master 12 10%
Other 9 8%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 40 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 25 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 40 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 172. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#234,723
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Research
#3
of 1,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,017
of 340,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Research
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,337 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.